1. does the paper examine all possible sources of evidence for or against global warming?
2. is the paper reciting relevant information?
3. are the methods for gathering data stated and are they accurate?
4. does the evidence support the main idea and does the paper as a whole follow logical reasoning? or does it simply state a bunch of random facts that do not apply to the idea presented.
5. are there multiple sources of evidence that draw the same conclusion? are there any sources that prove the hypothesis wrong?
No comments:
Post a Comment